Last Seen: 2025-04-21

GeneralInformation

21 / tcp
1828901610 | 2025-03-26T21:00:41.485841
22 / tcp
470206488 | 2025-04-03T01:32:40.178789
25 / tcp
-606455813 | 2025-04-06T13:27:07.227719
53 / tcp
-742258628 | 2025-04-01T23:30:29.711366
53 / udp
-1746919578 | 2025-04-20T10:55:39.881043
80 / tcp
589765266 | 2025-04-20T17:42:49.094851
110 / tcp
-542153081 | 2025-04-17T20:19:04.367288
123 / udp
-1224690465 | 2025-04-09T03:32:10.159751
443 / tcp
2013617963 | 2025-04-16T10:45:15.760177
587 / tcp
2040483697 | 2025-04-08T23:40:24.101055
993 / tcp
1240221827 | 2025-04-21T18:48:22.499873
995 / tcp
958054138 | 2025-04-20T12:31:59.958827
3306 / tcp
924379546 | 2025-04-15T07:39:55.480310
33060 / tcp
-795948505 | 2025-04-18T19:18:10.842595

Vulnerabilities

Note: the device may not be impacted by all of these issues. The vulnerabilities are implied based on the software and version.

2023(2)
CVE-2023-51766
5.3Exim before 4.97.1 allows SMTP smuggling in certain PIPELINING/CHUNKING configurations. Remote attackers can use a published exploitation technique to inject e-mail messages with a spoofed MAIL FROM address, allowing bypass of an SPF protection mechanism. This occurs because Exim supports <LF>.<CR><LF> but some other popular e-mail servers do not.
CVE-2023-44487
7.5The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.
2022(1)
CVE-2022-37451
7.5Exim before 4.96 has an invalid free in pam_converse in auths/call_pam.c because store_free is not used after store_malloc.
2021(2)
CVE-2021-23017
7.7A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory overwrite, resulting in worker process crash or potential other impact.
CVE-2021-3618
7.4ALPACA is an application layer protocol content confusion attack, exploiting TLS servers implementing different protocols but using compatible certificates, such as multi-domain or wildcard certificates. A MiTM attacker having access to victim's traffic at the TCP/IP layer can redirect traffic from one subdomain to another, resulting in a valid TLS session. This breaks the authentication of TLS and cross-protocol attacks may be possible where the behavior of one protocol service may compromise the other at the application layer.



Contact Us

Shodan ® - All rights reserved